Language Experience

1. Write somewhat your ago formal or informal words breeding experiences. Would you consider them stiff or ineffective? Learning foreign languages is a original contest to everyone and a lot of people surrender their own successful and goalless experiences. As for me, Id like to tell about a negative one because, unfortunately, I had it more than positive. Ive been development position since I was 10 years old. At first, it was at school. Those lessons left a lot to be desired. We had a middle-aged instructor who used to have deary students and showed her attitude, inhibitions cast aside.We didnt have speaking tasks at all. She gave us varied texts and we read, translated and learnt them by heart. Sometimes we redden didnt understand what we were speaking about which made it more difficult to answer. She didnt use any communicative approaches. What is more, we werent interested and motivated. At the age of 15 I near decided to give up learning it. Needless to say, it was a real shock to everyone when I announced my decision to enter Pedagogical University, the surgical incision of foreign languages.I was sure that I would learn it there. I had a private teacher to prep ar for entrance exams. At that time I thought she gave me a lot jockeyledge, but being a teacher now I can judge those lessons as a run off of time and money. Frankly speaking, it was self-studying. I was given 5 unites of grammar to do at home. Nobody explained any rules to me and we just checked exercises. Fortunately, at university I had a lot of different teachers. Some of them tried to use communicative tasks, such as role plays.But it was still academic studying. Teachers didnt request to motivate us as we all wanted to pass exams and tug a diploma. However ridiculous it may seem, I learnt English at work, being teacher is the best way to study. If I need to know something, I try to teach my students and after preparations for lessons and loads of explanations to them I vanquish to know a lot. So joining TESOL course is another chance to learn the language and ways of teaching . 2. Why do you prize the CLT has gained popularity in the language classroom?Our understanding of the processes of second language learning has changed considerably in the last 30 years and CLT is partly a response to these changes in understanding. Earlier views of language learning focused principal(a) on the mastery of grammatical competence. Language learning was viewed as a process of mechanical formation. Good habits be formed by having students wee correct sentences. Errors were to be revokeed through controlled opportunities for production. In recent years language learning has been viewed from a very different perspective.Communicative teaching idiom on task-oriented, student-centered language teaching practice, asked to show the life of the actual unavoidably of the English language to simulate a variety of life contexts, emotional, and to reserve stude nts with comprehensive use of English language, for communication of opportunities, its focus is not solitary(prenominal) a language in the form, grammatical accuracy, more emphasis on the appropriateness of language use, feasibility, communication skills, as well as reproduction students in communicative activities in the strain and business-solving ability.There are advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The pros are Language is acquired through communication CLT allows learners to use the target language in meaningful context CLT can be adapted to any train The cons are -Student may not see the value in learning English through group work, games, and activities. CLT does not focus on fault correction. Students dont feel challenged Taking everything into consideration, I should say that the cracking thing about the communicative approach is that it makes students speak the language even at a beginner level and they are usually wild about this. . How would you a pproach a class with true and ridiculous beginners? I got used to having mixed-ability classes and the mixture of false beginners (they have had some English train at some point in the past) and true beginners ( these are learners who have had no contact with English at all) is a common stake. I consider such classes a real advantage as it helps to avoid boring lessons and I always have some students to rely on.I try to pair a true beginner with a false one while doing some activities and it helps to create an interaction between students which substance a student-centred style of teaching. There are some drawbacks, of course. The false ones are faster to do exercises so I need to provide them with bare(a) work which means more careful preparation for the lesson. Another problem is a demotivation of both kinds of students. There are some classroom circumspection techniques which can help to avoid it. I should say it is a widely-spread situation but it can be successfully solve d by apply different methods of teaching.