A Meeting of Giants

Imagine that you are a participant in a table discussion with Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Albert Bandura, and Albert Ellis.The discussion is facilitated by a moderator who asks questions for each of you to answer consort to your different theories of personalizedity development and change. How would you and each of the other four board members answer the chaseing questions? (Note Construct the answers for the other panel members based on your hearing of their theories. Your own answers give reflect your personal opinions and beliefs, and may allow bits and pieces of other theories).The panel was finally assembled on that wet cold sidereal day in December. I was sapiditying a bit sheepish to be in the high partnership of such great scholars. Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Albert Bandura, and Albert Ellis were mighty powerful company for me to lock wits with. However, I believed that my opinion was just as big and plausible as in that location own. I was just reaching for my piddle glass when the moderator called us to order and begin immediately with the first question.Question 1How would you pardon the differences in persons regarding their reactions to situation? Why do some persons erupt to follow all the rules of others, while other persons appear intent on victuals by their own sets of rules?Dr. FreudThe human cosmos is essentially a civilise energy system. That energy is channeled, flows, or is blocked by a frame or different behaviors. The goal of all these behaviors is of course delight. Energy will always find the path of least resistance that leads to pleasure.When this energy is restrain or rerouted by societal demands, such as rules and taboos, that energy essential be vented in some way. some(prenominal) privates are to a greater extent apt at releasing this energy in a dictatorial manner, while others are more confounded by it.Some individuals forfeit in that location pursuit of pleasure and lead guilt ridden and often mis erable lives although they appear to be socially tractable. Others allow their natural propensity to pursue pleasure to guide their lives and are normally much happier, although society may feel they are living by their own rules.Dr. RogersI beg to resist with what my colleague Dr. Freud has stated. His theories are often rooted in sexual drives and motivations. However, the greatest human drive is the single goal towards ego-actualization. It is not necessary to ingest on which particular pleasure principle an individual is mootking to understand why they buck warrant.Those individuals that resist authorisation have simply bountiful from a less(prenominal) convoluted being into a more complex one. The less complex we are, the more authority we may feel we need.As an individual matures and develops, they become more complex and may seek to break the bond certificate of authority for a greater life experience. Those who go along with the billet quo perhaps see their lives i n the light that they have achieved what they can and there is no need to push further. We all simply seek to harbor and improve who we believe we are and the live experience in general. (Pervin, Cervon, & Oliver, 2005)Dr. BanduraSelf-efficacy has a great affect in egotism-development, perseverance in the face of resistance, resilience to trauma, and decision choices at crucial junctures in life. The rejection of authority is no greater than it is seen among adolescents and young adults.The ability to control and regulate self-efficacy is core to the ability to self-manage ones motivations, desires, and responses. Beliefs of personal efficacy are what feat an individual to adopt certain self regulatory standards (Bandura, Caprara, Barbaranelli, Gerbino, & Pastorelli, 2003) If a person believes that they are useful in society they are apt to be more law abiding and compliant of authority (Bandura et al., 2003). When other individuals feel as if their self-worth is low they are les s likely to respect authority and will live as they see fit because of their standing in society. (Pervin et al., 2005)Dr. EllisSelf-evaluation leads to depression and repression, and avoidance of change. The best subject for human health is that we should stop evaluating ourselves altogether. There is often concern for individuals because of their self image and societal pressures.These two are more likely to be in agreement than in conflict. The key is to see behaviors for what they are. Is there anyone who likes authority? Of course not we all have some disagreement with being told what to do by someone else. However true this may be it is not the authority that causes problems for most individuals it is the irrational beliefs that adherence or rejection of this authority will lead to some dire consequence.This in itself may cause individuals to have one reaction or the other to the rule makers. Some may choose total compliance in hopes that life cadaver stable, or what appears to be total anarchy and disrespect for any authority because it has no affect.